WEBVTT

00:00:01.530 --> 00:00:02.470
It took us about

00:00:02.470 --> 00:00:05.170
13 months just in discussions

00:00:05.170 --> 00:00:07.510
and that's on us and that's on me.

00:00:07.630 --> 00:00:10.580
I'm very slow when it comes to these things and deliberate.

00:00:10.694 --> 00:00:12.134
The actual implementation,

00:00:12.134 --> 00:00:14.784
which we were slow,

00:00:15.294 --> 00:00:17.274
we were very deliberate again,

00:00:17.274 --> 00:00:18.714
and that took us

00:00:18.714 --> 00:00:19.634
six weeks.

00:00:19.750 --> 00:00:21.660
Realistically, looking back,

00:00:22.330 --> 00:00:23.740
the fact that we were the first,

00:00:24.190 --> 00:00:25.680
being deliberate is not a bad thing.

00:00:25.844 --> 00:00:27.084
Realistically, Jonathan,

00:00:27.084 --> 00:00:28.104
I think an organization

00:00:28.104 --> 00:00:29.584
could deploy this,

00:00:29.584 --> 00:00:31.864
internal coordination

00:00:31.864 --> 00:00:33.244
with accounting and finance,

00:00:33.244 --> 00:00:34.424
within a

00:00:34.424 --> 00:00:35.484
couple of weeks

00:00:35.484 --> 00:00:38.704
with not a significant lift

00:00:38.704 --> 00:00:40.834
for resource deployment.

00:00:40.944 --> 00:00:41.584
Is that fair?

